Discussion:
Future of the global networks.
(too old to reply)
Michaelo
2003-07-07 15:14:11 UTC
Permalink
Hi there.
About a weak ago I read the article about Semantic Web.

Well.
I have my own vision (conception) of the future of
Web or other global network.

Semantic Web is DEAD !!!
It'll born dead.

Just let me explain why I think so.

Today the elements of what we call semantic web are provided by
search engines. But a folk which registers their sites
in search engines tend for any price increase probability
of finding their sites.
Only size of allowed key information make that folk restrict
key information.
Yes, I admit that there are people who tend to make
search as much relevant. But unfortunately, it seams
number of visits of their sites is in minority.

Understand me ???

What I describes is a model which, I guess, will be extended on
semantic Web.

Well. What I propose.
I propose to create peer to peer network.
Which will search information for each network user personally.

I should say that here under "peer to peer" I mean even usenet,
gnutella, ect..

It must be global peer to peer network.
Which will dynamically change its configuration,
according to "trust levels", of each user.
I mean that each search session must be
a search in distributed data base, but different
"segment" of the data base may have different
level of trust. Configuration of trust levels
of several segments must be very individual.
It must be depended by "personality configuration" of network user.
Such configuration of trust levels must be calculated dynamically,
and such calculation must be based on choices of the user.

This network must give similar results of search,
for people with similar "configuration of personality".
And this network must work such even fro new
(for current searcher) subjects of search.

--Michaelo Mitrofanov

P.S. To connect me via eMail remove spam block from my eMail.

P.P.S. von Neumann programming, UNIX-like operation systems, and
internet are obsolete !!!
Malcolm Dew-Jones
2003-08-07 22:20:27 UTC
Permalink
Michaelo (***@NoUnsolicited.ukr.net) wrote:
: Hi there.
: About a weak ago I read the article about Semantic Web.

: Well.
: I have my own vision (conception) of the future of
: Web or other global network.

: Semantic Web is DEAD !!!
: It'll born dead.

: Just let me explain why I think so.

: Today the elements of what we call semantic web are provided by
: search engines. But a folk which registers their sites
: in search engines tend for any price increase probability
: of finding their sites.
: Only size of allowed key information make that folk restrict
: key information.
: Yes, I admit that there are people who tend to make
: search as much relevant. But unfortunately, it seams
: number of visits of their sites is in minority.

: Understand me ???

: What I describes is a model which, I guess, will be extended on
: semantic Web.

: Well. What I propose.
: I propose to create peer to peer network.
: Which will search information for each network user personally.

: I should say that here under "peer to peer" I mean even usenet,
: gnutella, ect..

: It must be global peer to peer network.
: Which will dynamically change its configuration,
: according to "trust levels", of each user.
: I mean that each search session must be
: a search in distributed data base, but different
: "segment" of the data base may have different
: level of trust. Configuration of trust levels
: of several segments must be very individual.
: It must be depended by "personality configuration" of network user.
: Such configuration of trust levels must be calculated dynamically,
: and such calculation must be based on choices of the user.

: This network must give similar results of search,
: for people with similar "configuration of personality".
: And this network must work such even fro new
: (for current searcher) subjects of search.

: --Michaelo Mitrofanov

: P.S. To connect me via eMail remove spam block from my eMail.

: P.P.S. von Neumann programming, UNIX-like operation systems, and
: internet are obsolete !!!

Ideas, such as this one, (which is a good idea though hardly new) are a
dime a dozen.

The issue is finding a practical way to implement them.

Loading...